Example · cross-references attachments · flags contradictions
Reconcile an investor's claim
When a lead investor remembers a term you never agreed to, find the receipts.
The prompt
“An investor says we agreed to X, but I remember Y. Find our full thread, pull any term sheets and decks they sent, and show me what was actually agreed to.”
The scenario
Your lead investor emailed the founders' group chat claiming a right of first refusal on the Series A. You raised the seed 14 months ago. You do not remember agreeing to that.
Before you reply — in a chat, on a call, anywhere that could be quoted back at you — you want the actual record of what was sent, signed, and agreed to.
Sample output
An illustrative response. Real outputs cite actual senders, dates, message IDs, and attached files from your mailbox.
What you actually agreed to
Instrument: Post-money SAFE, $1.5M, $12M cap, 20% discount.
Signed: Feb 11 2025 (attached: SAFE_signed_2025-02-11.pdf).
Board / information rights: Quarterly updates only. No board seat. No observer seat.
Pro-rata: Standard major-investor pro-rata on future priced rounds.
ROFR: None. Not in the signed SAFE. Not in any prior draft.
Where the claim diverges from the record
The investor's Oct 24 email to the group chat says:
"As we discussed during the raise, we have right of first refusal on the A."
Searching the full thread from Dec 2024–Feb 2025:
- No email mentions "ROFR" or "right of first refusal"
- Term-sheet draft v2 (their redline, Jan 09) removed a pro-rata expansion clause; no ROFR ever introduced
- The executed SAFE is the May 19 draft v4, unchanged from draft v3 except for the signature page
Suggested reply frame
You can reply politely with the signed SAFE attached and a one-liner: "Happy to continue the conversation — attaching the executed SAFE for reference. Flagged terms are the only ones in effect."
Run this on your own inbox
No sign-up. Connect a mailbox, the prompt is already prefilled.
More examples
Build a case from legal threats
Turn a string of escalating demand letters into a clean timeline your lawyer can work from.
multi-step · hundreds of messages · timeline output
Round up every signed contract
A due-diligence-ready inventory, in the time it takes to make coffee.
bulk fetch · PDF extraction · structured table
Triage urgent items
Get the actionable signal out of 300 unread in under a minute.
fast · prioritized · actionable
Find the email you know exists
Fuzzy memory in, specific message out.
targeted search · fuzzy memory recall